Can Special Relativity handle accelerations?
It is a common misconception that Special Relativity
cannot handle accelerating objects or accelerating reference
frames. It is claimed that general relativity is required because
special relativity only applies to inertial frames. This
is not true. Special relativity treats accelerating frames
differently from inertial frames but can still deal with
them. Accelerating objects can be dealt with without
even calling upon accelerating frames.
This error often comes up in the context of the
twin paradox when people
claim that it can only be resolved in general relativity
because of acceleration. This is not the case.
The only sense in which special relativity is an
approximation when there are accelerating bodies is
that gravitational effects such as generation of
gravitational waves are being ignored. But of course
there are larger gravitational effects being neglected even
when massive bodies are not accelerating and they are
small for many applications so this is not strictly
relevant. Special relativity gives a completely
self-consistent description of the mechanics of accelerating
bodies neglecting gravitation, just as Newtonian
mechanics did.
The difference between general and special relativity
is that in the general theory all frames of reference including
spinning and accelerating frames are treated on an equal
footing. In special relativity accelerating frames are
different from inertial frames. Velocities are relative
but acceleration is treated as absolute. In general relativity
all motion is relative. To accommodate this change general
relativity has to use curved space-time. In special relativity
space-time is always flat.
In special relativity an accelerating particle has a
worldline which is not straight. This is not difficult
to handle. The 4-vector acceleration can be defined as
the derivative with respect to proper time of the
4-velocity. It is possible to solve the equations of motion
for a particle in electric and magnetic fields, for example.
Accelerating reference frames are a different matter.
In GR the physical equations take the same form in any
co-ordinate system. In SR they do not but it is still
possible to use co-ordinate systems corresponding to
accelerating or rotating frames of reference just
as it is possible to solve ordinary mechanics problems
in curvilinear co-ordinate systems. This is done by
introducing a metric tensor. The formalism is very
similar to that of many general relativity problems
but it is still special relativity so long as the
space-time is constrained to be flat and Minkowskian.
Note that the speed of light is rarely constant
in non-inertial frames and this has been known to
cause confusion.
An example would be a rotating frame of reference used
to deal with a rotating object. The transformation of
the metric into the rotating frame would lead to
"fictitious" forces such as Coriolis forces
and centrifugal forces. It is not very different from
ordinary mechanics.
A simple problem is to solve the motion of a body
which accelerates constantly. What does this mean? We don't
mean that it's acceleration as measured by an inertial
observer is constant. We mean that it is moving
so that the acceleration measured in an inertial frame
travelling at the same instantaneous velocity as the
object is the same at any moment. If it was a rocket
and you were on board you would experience a constant
G force. This problem can be solved in a number of
ways. One is to use four-vector acceleration along
it's worldline which must have constant magnitude.
Alternatively, the object is passing constantly
from one inertial frame to another in such a way that
it's change of speed in a fixed time interval seen as
a Lorentz boost is always the same. From our understanding
of adding velocities
we can see that the rapidity r of the object
must be increasing at a constant rate a with
respect to the proper time of the object T. The
rapidity is related to velocity v by the equation
v = c tanh(r/c)
From this we derive the equation
v = c tanh(aT/c)
For other acceleration equations see the
relativity FAQ article on the
relativistic rocket.
|